ANALYSIS
Our analyses include the pixels and hues of the pens.
The Indiana Voter Registration application available online is not the same today as it was in 2016. There is a suspicious imperfection in the lower line of the signature box; however, because the Signature in Question crosses the top of the box running into the ID Number Box, it does appear the Client signed the card . . . .
The Signature in Question appears to be Client BC’s true signature; however, the document itself was altered. Other than the signature of the Voter Registration Card which does match the Client’s presented true Signature, the handwriting / printing & numerals are not a match between the Voter Registration & either of the two Money Orders. . . . Upon comparison of the pen of the print & the pen of the signature, the same pen was used.
There was a forged digital transference of the Client’s signature onto the voter registration card. This indicated mass voter election fraud on the part of the State of Indiana Election Division. Since this client was an immigration client, the US Department of Immigration is suspected. The IRS is suspect.
LAST WILL & TESTAMENT FORGERY
The signature writing of the Will Document that presents to be the signature of Mr. L is not Mr. L’s true signature. The Notary appears to be faked. Analyst perceives that the person who signed the (Name Redacted) Witness Signature forged the signature of Mr. L. Analyst perceives the will to be a fraudulent document with the beneficiaries of the will having illegally conspired with the notary and witness(es). If desired but not necessary based on these results proving that the Will in Question is fraudulent, Analyst suggests Client create investigatory wills at the two Nolo Will Creation websites above for comparison to the Will in Question in this case. Doing so will allow comparison for the purpose of age-dating and for the purpose of truthfulness of the document. Analyst conducted an online inquiry of all parties including Client to ensure impartiality. Analyst did not find anything derogatory about this client online.
LANDLORD-TENANT FORGERY
It was the landlord who printed the person of interest’s name on the security deposit receipt. It is not unreasonable for a landlord to fill in (print) the name of a tenant on a security deposit receipt. The lease documents have clearly been altered. I would like to analyze (Redacted) & four other parts of the lease documents & conduct an investigation as to why the lease documents were altered. Although I am not a certified private investigator, I conduct shadow examinations (investigations) within the context of Signature Analysis. I would like to shadow the landlord & the person of interest. I do catch individuals in fraud & corruption as visible in my pro se lawsuits. I would be happy to attend court if desired. Any alterations to this Signature Analysis Affidavit will be sued. If you would like it notarized, I will do so at additional cost (fee, printing, mileage, notary, scanning).
Would the court request an original of this 15-page 247-lined document directly from amberlywilliams2028@gmail.com to ensure authenticity? Would the Client please provide the name of the opposing attorney? If you do not yet have an attorney, I prepare & file documents (legal Complaint, Motions, & other documents) as you represent pro se. We offer incentives for referrals. I also conduct Art Analyses to detect fraud & authenticate art. Please let me know how I may serve you.
MORTGAGE CLAIM FRAUD FORGERY
We suspect every party until our signature analysis proves the truth as it does when we have complete information. If the client or any party would like to submit additional “true” signatures of the Person of Interest or any of the afore-mentioned documents / signatures, I would be happy to conduct further analysis.
It would be important to prove WHEN the client signed the additional documents she presented, whether before the Partial Claim Mortgage Document concern or following. I would be happy to investigate. Although not private investigators, we are corruption busters. We engage in shadow-examinations.
The Signature in Question is not the same as the Client’s True Signatures. It appears that the same person may have signed both Mr. S'’ signature & the true signature; however, I cannot be certain without further examination.
REQUEST FOR HS’s TRUE SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS
Would the client, client’s attorney, or the court please subpoena H's true (Driver’s License) signature & other of his true signatures AND the Driver’s License signature & other true signatures of the Notary? I would like to ensure that the signature presented as that of HS is his true signature.
REQUEST FOR CLEAN COPY OF PARTIAL CLAIM MORTGAGE DOCUMENT & THE LENDER REPRESENTATIVE’S TRUE SIGNATURES
Would the parties please provide a clean copy of the original Partial Claim Mortgage Document?
REQUEST TO EXAMINE THE NOTARY STAMP & SIGNATURE
An analysis of the Notary Stamp is also appropriate.
REQUEST CONFIRMATION FROM OFFICE OF GOVERNOR
I would like to confirm the authenticity of the letter from the Office of the Governor.
REQUEST TO EXAMINE THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
In signature analysis involving transactions with financial institutions, it is appropriate to consider the possibility of embezzlement on the part of the institution. The signatures & documents promulgated by the financial institution should be analyzed.
Without these requested items, this signature analysis is incomplete. In a spirit of carefulness, I am reluctant to suspect anything of anyone without these additional items.
THE REASON THIS ANALYSIS REMAINS INCOMPLETE.
This client paid $450 for this assessment. Her initial request was that I analyze only the Signature in Question as compared to her true Signature at my standard rate of $300 per signature overlay, but such partial analysis would have been incomplete. Additional analysis was necessary – the analysis of the signature of the Person of Interest & the pen at an additional $300.00. She expressed reluctance, requested to leave it at the single overlay.
In a prior case in which a separate, different client requested only PARTIAL ANALYSIS to the point of her satisfaction, if I had ceased the analysis at that time, I would not have caught herself in fraud. A complete & thorough analysis is always necessary. Partial Analyses may result in wrongful convictions.
Because of this concern of PARTIAL (INCOMPLETE) ANALYSIS, I told this present client I was not comfortable with such an incomplete analysis & gave her a discount for the second overlay. It was necessary to conduct several more overlays than those for which she covered the cost. Any further analysis will be at $300 per overlay, within reason. I never overlay anything other than necessary to conduct a complete & thorough analysis because of the severity of the repercussions & liability of an incomplete analysis. As we all know, it is a crime to convict any individual without clear, concise evidence. This present analysis is non-conclusive without the further analysis upon receipt of the additional items requested.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend conducting one further overlay at a time, beginning with HS’s driver’s license, then the Notary’s driver’s license if needed, then the other documents on overlay at a time if needed. This will keep costs low. I do not suspect the financial institution nor the governor’s office at this time; that of HS & the Notary may completely rule out the institution & office, but I do not rule any party out until final conclusion.
ELOHIM SIGNATURE ANALYST CATCHES THEIR OWN CLIENT IN FORGERY
The Client deceptively altered (forged) both the 2nd & 3rd signatures of the Credit Application. She altered the first & second signatures with two different pens. On 03/21/2028, I called the dealership facility in question & requested a copy of the blank credit application with intent to apply as a shadow-examiner. I was transferred to the finance department. A male employee answered. He took my name & email address & sent me the link to the credit application.
Upon analyzing all three of the different credit application signatures, the Client used three different pens. The client withheld documents in this analysis. That is, she did not give me all of the signatures that should have been analyzed in this case up front to allow a complete analysis & conclusion. I had to inquire for the credit application for a 3rd time, at which time she produced a 3rd copy of the credit application that contained her 3rd alteration. Whereas, until I conducted the final analysis, I most highly suspected Wells Fargo or Ally Bank because Client stated they provided her with the latter two copies of the credit application, after having analyzed the final two signatures to learn that there was a third pen, I conclude that it was definitely the Client who altered her signatures in an attempt to convict the dealership of fraud so she could evade the financial agreement she entered with the dealership.
Whereas when I asked the Client about the 2nd altered signature before analyzing it completely, Client answered, “I may have zoomed in a little as I was evaluating the signature that I know was altered.”
I sized the latter two applications to EQUAL distribution in order to reveal differences between the two latter signatures that I aforetime believed might have suggested fraud on the part of either Wells Fargo, Ally Bank, or the Client. My thoughts at that time were, It is possible the Client herself altered the credit application & its signatures to be absolved of fees AND, there is the possibility that the dealership altered the credit application & sent “updated” versions to Ally Bank or Wells Fargo, but the complete analysis proved differently, that the Client is at fault.
Once I asked the client for a next retainer fee to cover the cost of the overlays that would allow me to analyze the 3rd alteration, Client deceptively requested to cease the analysis. She asked me to cease at my conclusion at that particular point in time when I suspected either the bank or the auto dealership without further analysis, but at that time, the analysis was yet incomplete, and she knew that.
Of course, the purpose of a signature analysis is to arrive at conclusions in as much as possible to determine who committed the fraud. Here, it is important to note that:
The client did not provide me with all of the documents for this analysis up front. I had to ask for additional documents as I went along, which was how I determined that there were not only one, but two (or more) separate alterations to her “original” signature. That the client did not provide all documentation up front reveals she was CONCEALING information from the analysis.
The facts that there were two alterations to the credit application, Client had three copies of the credit application (the initial application with no alteration, the 2nd application with the first alteration, & the 3rd application with the 2nd alteration), that she concealed the 3rd credit application & only gave it to me when I inquired further, apparently having become confused & believing she was giving me the 2nd application again, & the fact that she wanted me to leave my report at an incomplete & misleading conclusion (much can change in a signature analysis with a single analysis &/or new information & it did in this case), a misleading conclusion that would have left the appearance that the forgery occurred at the hand of either the dealership or one of the banks is especially convicting on the Client’s part.
When the need to analyze the 3rd altered signature arose, I asked the Client for a next retainer fee (my contract allows Clients to pay for signatures in retainer amounts as we go), she refused to pay me to analyze the 3rd signatures, obviously an attempt to prevent me from arriving at complete, accurate conclusions. She intended for me to leave the analysis only partially completed at the point at which it appeared the dealership or one of the banks was guilty. I proceeded to analyze the 3rd signature anyway, without payment, because I intended to arrive at accurate conclusions as much as possible with the information I have because I understood the information would be important to law enforcement & to arriving at the truth in this case.
Once I analyzed the 3rd signature & found it indeed altered & with a 3rd pen, I most highly suspected the Client herself of altering her own signature in attempt to cause the dealership to appear to have committed forgery in attempt to evade her financial contract with the dealership.
My contract with clients & the way I do business with them is to provide them PARTIAL REPORTS prior to asking for additional retainers as needed. I provided this client with two prior PARTIAL REPORTS, Reports in which my conclusions were incomplete, & she knew & understood that they were; they were partials preceding next payments per the contractual agreement. I am concerned that the client will use the partial reports wrongfully in this case. To submit the inaccurate partials to the police as evident would constitute another crime on the part of this Client.
At a prior point, in the 2nd Report I gave the Client, I was mistaken when I stated the dealership did not send me the credit application. I have three separate email addresses. I did in fact receive it from the dealership. I received a follow-up call from the dealership on 03/23/2026 & we clarified my email address & I received a second copy of the credit application.
On 03/23/2026, I called the Sheriff’s Office because the police non-emergency dispatcher told me the client’s address fell within the Sheriff’s jurisdiction, but the Sheriff stated he believed the Client. Since I continued to suspect the Client, since I was uncertain as to the status of the case with law enforcement at this time, & since the client had become non-compliant with the assessment, I found it necessary to warn the dealership of this situation, as in a duty to warn an involved party in order to ensure that the dealership was not wrongfully harmed by the client (in order to protect the dealership from wrongful criminal harm on the part of the client). I emailed a copy of my report, the 3 credit applications, & the other two dealership documents stated above to the dealership.
I received a 2nd email from the Deputy Sheriff that the jurisdiction fell to the Police Department. On 03/25/2026, I called the Police Department & was told that there was an Officer already on the case. The Dispatcher stated she would ask him to call me, but I did not receive a call back from him.
On 03/25/2026, I filed a report with the FBI.
Based on my findings above, I do not find it necessary to complete the dealership’s credit application as a test. The dealership is not guilty, & neither of the banks are guilty.
For the aforestated reasons, I conclude that it was the Client herself who criminally altered the signatures.
Although I was hired strictly for the purpose of signature analysis, ELOHIM ENTERPRISES conducts shadow-examinations (rather than formal investigations) to expose corruption. We are not private investigators, but we do provide a shadow-examination service that allows us to follow & examine suspects aloofly. Our other corruption busts are pursued as lawsuits.
03/25/2026 I updated my contract & sent a fresh copy of the contract to the Client. She responded by email accusing me of unprofessionalism because I did not cease the analysis when she wanted me to & demanding a reimbursement amount, but again, signature analysis is incomplete until all signatures have been fully analyzed & conclusions have been drawn in as much as possible.
Because I did not hear from the PD, am uncertain as to the status of this case, & do not want the dealership parties wrongfully prosecuted for a crime they did not commit when it was the Client herself who committed the fraud, I will provide the dealership with a copy of this report for its final conclusion so that the dealership is not convicted based on one of the prior partial (incomplete) reports the Client may have submitted to the police in which my conclusions may have been misleading based on client’s fraudulent, misleading activity. Emails between myself & this Client & a copy of my contracts as they are & have been with this Client are available by subpoena as I have now determined that this report adequately notifies the dealership of Client’s fraudulent & criminal activity. Although I have concluded herein, it is important that the FBI & the police follow through with a complete investigation. As stated in my contractual agreement with this client, it is possible that any Signature Analyst may err, myself included. I always recommend a second signature analysis for the safety of all parties. If the dealership can prove a further need to know, I will forward my emails with the Client to the dealership & their attorney in order to protect the dealership from wrongful harm on the part of the Client in the absence of my knowledge of the legal status of this case so that they are not wrongfully convicted. I also attribute to the Client the crime of falsifying information in a legal setting. She clearly attempted to use me wrongfully inside her subversive, criminal activity & intent.
On 03/26/2026, I made webform-contact with the District Attorney because Client stated the DA has this case. I did not discover that the DA had this case until 03/26/2026 when I further reviewed my emails with Client during my edits of this Report. There were errors in my prior Reports, which is not unreasonable as they were understood to be incomplete works in progress, shown only as demonstrations of my work in progress to the client & for her feedback as we go. By feedback, I mean that the Client should have corrected me if I recorded any misunderstandings inside my Report. That the Client did not correct me when, inside the Report, I recorded that I find her suspect of this fraud is curious. If she was not guilty of the fraud, she would have said so & would have disputed the content of my documents. She never did so.
DIGITAL OVERLAY SIGNATURE ANALYSIS PROCESS & ACCURACY
I place one signature, writing, or document on top & overlaid the other, resulting in digital overlays for comparison. I analyze pen strokes, stylus, starts, stops, corrections, deletions, erasures, alterations, obliterations, consistency, curves, flourishes, flow, slant/tilt, hook, style, lifts, lines, loops, alignment, spacing, the linking of letters, pressure, tremors/shakiness, smudging, dips, diacritic marks (i-dots, t-crosses), jots, size, & scale. I examine documents (paper) for folds, creases, spots, stains, discoloration, & copy lines. I detect the use of & differences in pens used to sign or print. I use integrated analysis of ink & paper, visual, comparative, mathematical, & statistical methods. While there are other (different types of) signature analysis processes, including Electrostatic Detection Apparatus (ESDA), Gas & Thin-Layer Microspectrophotometry (infrared, ultraviolet) & stereomicroscopic (three-dimensional) analysis, statistical, Computer Assisted Handwriting Examination (CAHE), Artificial Intelligence, & Machine Learning, Digital methods yield greater accuracy (approximately 95%) & digital methods reduce subjectiveness (IGI Global, 2026) because of the direct overly. My Digital Overlay process passes the scientific test (graphology) for handwriting analysis encompassing the appropriate characteristics (pen strokes, etc. as named above) necessary to draw forensic conclusions.
MY UNRELATED BACKGROUND
I am a Doctor of Business Administration with Specialization in Public Administration. My Master’s Degree is in Rehabilitation Counseling, Bachelor’s in Social Science, Associates in General Studies with English Emphasis. In 2006, I began private practice by founding a private Vocational Rehabilitation Firm, The Job Lady, Inc., serving the State of Oregon Department of Human Services Office of Vocational Rehabilitation & their clients to assist people with disabilities with employment needs. I added contracts across time, including contracts with the U.S. Social Security Administration, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Vocational Rehabilitation & Education Division, & the Oregon Commission for the Blind. I became a Vocational Expert Witness in 2010, then a non-attorney Social Security Disability Representative in 2011. I began self-representing in 2023.
MY SIGNATURE ANALYSIS BACKGROUND
I began performing DIGITAL OVERLAY in 2008. I also perform Document Authentication, Art Forgery Analysis, & Art Authentication. I have been serving in legal settings & appearing in court since 2010.
PURPOSE
The purpose of Signature Analysis is to detect forgeries, alterations, copyright violations, & such crimes. It is not a crime to copy signatures, art, documents, or other materials for the purpose of forensic analysis. The signatures, art, & materials used in the analysis are used for the sole purpose of analysis, will not be used for any other purpose, & must not be copied for use by others for any reason without the documented permission of the court, attorney, client, signature, or document owner(s). Use without permission constitutes crime & incites liability. Unauthorized use of this document violates privacy & HIPAA laws & will be prosecuted.
Exception: We reserve the right to use clips that will not allow the distinguishment of signatures into our advertising.
WILL OUR PROCESS HOLD UP IN COURT?
Yes. Our Affidavits are certified, sealed, court-ready legal documents. Judges take them seriously. Regardless of process methodology, every analyst does the best they can to discern & detect fraud. Once we receive the requested items & payment, we will conduct the analysis & provide you with a court-ready certified legal Report with images of the overlays, showing the signature comparisons & describing our findings & conclusion.
RETAINER
For signature analysis, we require the full amount up front. Although I may show you portions of our work before the Analysis Report is complete, I will not release the full completed document until the analysis is paid in full as explained below.
A signature analysis is not complete until all pertaining signatures have been analyzed. Like any signature analyst, we may, based on our analysis, find it necessary to involve law enforcement, including contacting the sheriff, police, FBI, Department of Human Services, or other parties.
Ask us for a copy of our SIGNATURE ANALYSIS CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT for your consideration.
RUSH FEE: If you require less than 10 days for your Affidavit Report, we charge a rush fee of $100.
NOTARY PUBLIC: Notary public is not standard with our Affidavit Reports because the Courts accept our Affidavits without Notary Public. IF YOU WOULD LIKE NOTARY PUBLIC, We do so at additional cost of $125 to account for notary, time, printing, scanning, travel.
COURT FEES: Our Affidavits are complete in and of themselves so that it is not necessary for us to attend court after we have completed an Affidavit for you; however, if you or your attorney would like us to attend court to undergo examination & cross examination and if your hearing will only last 1 hour, we charge $90.00, which includes prep time and the hearing reservation and schedule. Additional hours are at $30 per hour. Most experts charge $125 per hour.
NEED AN ATTORNEY? We expedite your case.
We help you sue pro se at less cost than an attorney. We compose and file documents for you and attend court as an Expert Witness instead of an Attorney. We compose legal Complaints, Affidavits, Motions, & Other Legal Documents & file them in court for you. We attend court virtually or by phone. $30 per hour. You pay copying, mailing, court, & all other such costs. Elohim Legal's website is:
https://jurisprolegalselfexpediting.yourwebsitespace.com/?r=1782343247226
OR
ART FORGERY / ART FRAUD ANALYSIS @ $4500. We detect fakes via digital overlay. We can fly to you if needed; you pay cost of flight & rental car.
BUSINESS ANALYSIS: We increase your profits / grow your business. Exponential return on investment (ROI). Marketing analysis included.
OR/AND
MARKETING AGENT. Business Analysis self-assessment coming soon. Please visit regularly.
RESUME DEVELOPER BY PHONE &/OR EMAIL. $100 RESUME. $50.00 C0VER-LETTER.
OUR PROCESS:
1. Free Initial Consultation
2. Intake / Simple Contractual Agreement
3. Case Evaluation
4. Especially Thorough Affidavit Report
5. Expert Witness Testimony
6. Ongoing Collaboration
7. Court appearances if desired.
TESTIMONIALS
"Good news! The client received a fully favorable decision. . ." - Maggie Schott, Esquire.
"Dr Williams, You're an angel of the truth. You have verbalized what I was trying to say. Even though Florida is a no-fault state at least this would open the door as to how I was tricked. There are no words to thank you for the job you have done." - Felicia.
"Your assessment is spot on. . . . What's more, your support and empathy mean a lot." - Carla
"I am soooooo grateful for your work which I am sure is going to help me win . . . !" - Aviva Brown, Esquire.
"The report is very detailed. Thank you for your time and promptness." - MP.
____________________________________________________
OTHER SERVICES:
BUSINESS ANALYST, MARKETING / ADVERTISING / LOGOS / BROCHURES / WEB-HOSTING
Celebrity signatures courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=donald+trump+signature&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image
Thank you, Wikimedia.
Call Dr. Amber Williams at (971) 771-4823 for Signature / Handwriting / Document / Art FORGERY ANALYSIS TODAY.
Visit her JURISPRO EXPERT WITNESS DIRECTORY Website: https://www.jurispro.com/search?search=amber+williams&_token=Uelgsnf2WKwOHyXtbYJY0mKsiIRttH6BtqHfJQ3a
